Comments on: How To Crash A Plane: Conservative Bible Project – Conservapedia http://waynepark.com/2009/10/07/how-to-crash-a-plane-conservative-bible-project-conservapedia/ WAYNEPARK.COM: meditations on faith | place | race Sun, 03 Oct 2010 02:53:07 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1 By: Wayne http://waynepark.com/2009/10/07/how-to-crash-a-plane-conservative-bible-project-conservapedia/comment-page-1/#comment-489 Wayne Thu, 08 Oct 2009 16:17:45 +0000 http://waynepark.com/?p=1305#comment-489 Clearly I would think. It's just bizarre. Some of the presumptions are just bizarre. Clearly I would think. It’s just bizarre. Some of the presumptions are just bizarre.

]]> By: Rob http://waynepark.com/2009/10/07/how-to-crash-a-plane-conservative-bible-project-conservapedia/comment-page-1/#comment-487 Rob Wed, 07 Oct 2009 20:08:49 +0000 http://waynepark.com/?p=1305#comment-487 Very interesting Wayne. The primary methodological fallacy I see is attributing "liberal" bias to features and decisions that were made well before liberalism even existed. Along with that, failing to define what is meant by liberalism. Also I see them pretty consistently using ideology rather than textual criticism to make textual decisions. Fair enough, if they admit (and maybe they do) that they think "conservativism" is the rule for all truth. That may in fact be the approach. I don't see claims that these people are necessarily Christians aiming at a biblical understanding. Is this more of an attempt to adjust religion to a political agenda? Very interesting Wayne. The primary methodological fallacy I see is attributing “liberal” bias to features and decisions that were made well before liberalism even existed. Along with that, failing to define what is meant by liberalism. Also I see them pretty consistently using ideology rather than textual criticism to make textual decisions. Fair enough, if they admit (and maybe they do) that they think “conservativism” is the rule for all truth. That may in fact be the approach. I don’t see claims that these people are necessarily Christians aiming at a biblical understanding. Is this more of an attempt to adjust religion to a political agenda?

]]> By: Cameron http://waynepark.com/2009/10/07/how-to-crash-a-plane-conservative-bible-project-conservapedia/comment-page-1/#comment-486 Cameron Wed, 07 Oct 2009 19:06:34 +0000 http://waynepark.com/?p=1305#comment-486 Indeed. This is weird. I am ashamed that some Christians have chosen to make the Bible a political tool...happens on both sides of the fence. I suppose they'll update it every 4 years with an endorsement of the conservative running for President.... What shall they call this translation? How about the King Falwell Version...or King Phelps Version.... Indeed. This is weird. I am ashamed that some Christians have chosen to make the Bible a political tool…happens on both sides of the fence.

I suppose they’ll update it every 4 years with an endorsement of the conservative running for President….

What shall they call this translation? How about the King Falwell Version…or King Phelps Version….

]]>